The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex Parte ULRICH HAMMON, HOLGER HERBST and GERHARD NESTLER _______________ Appeal No. 2003-0849 Application 09/622,916 _______________ HEARD: November 18, 2003 _______________ Before WALTZ1, KRATZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 1 to 15, all of the pending claims in the application.2 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. 1 Paul Lieberman, Administrative Patent Judge, who participated in the oral hearing for this appeal, is now retired. Therefore, Thomas A. Waltz, Administrative Patent Judge, has been added to the panel for participation in the subject decision. Reargument is not required. See In re Bose Corp., 772 F.2d 866, 869, 227 USPQ 1, 4 (Fed. Cir. 1985). 2 In rendering our decision we have considered Appellants’ position present in the Brief, filed March 26, 2002 and the Reply Brief, filed July 17, 2002.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007