Appeal No. 2003-0949 Application 09/164,517 differing contexts and coefficient types from differing portions of the image. (Appellants’ brief, page 2) Claim 1 is representative of the claimed invention and is reproduced as follows: 1. A method of encoding an image, comprising the steps of: (a) decomposing an image into bitplanes; and (b) arithmetic encoding the bitplanes with a context model from the neighboring bits in a bitplane and previous bits at the location in previous bitplanes. References The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows: Boliek et al (Boliek) 6,141,446 Oct. 31, 2000 (filed September 30, 1997) Rabbani et al (Rabbani) 5,442,458 Aug. 15, 1995 Healey et al (Healey) 5,357,250 Oct. 18, 1994 Oda 5,703,646 Dec. 30, 1997 (filed December 19, 1996) Rust 5,901,251 May 4, 1999 (filed March 18, 1997) Rejections At Issue Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over the combination of Boliek and Rabbani. Claims 2-3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over the combination of Boliek, Rabbani and Healey. Claims 4-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007