The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte WILLIAM PRESTEN ALEXANDER III
and
WEIMING GU
_______________
Appeal No. 2003-0954
Application No. 09/306,190
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.
MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-3, 7-14, and 18-24. The
Examiner has indicated claims 4-6 and 15-17 as allowable. (Final rejection, paper number 5,
page 7)
Invention
Appellant’s invention relates to a process and system for dynamically compiling a
program. (Appellants’ specification, page 1, lines 15-17) Particularly, if during execution it is
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007