The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PATRICK JOSEPH CALLAGHAN,
MICHAEL JAMES HOWLAND, and STEVEN M. PRITKO
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1031
Application No. 09/050,8411
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
A patent examiner rejected claims 1-7, 9-27, and 29-52. The appellants appeal
therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We affirm-in-part.
BACKGROUND
1The original application was published on January 17, 2002 as Published
Application No. 20020007317.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007