Appeal No. 2003-1042 Page 6 Application No. 09/019,764 In response, Appellants assert that: One skilled in the art would have turned to Table 3 for guidance as to the scope to be given the word “approximately” in the claims because Table 3 reports the repeated measurements of actual concentrations of the preservative components of several vaccine samples. Table 3 shows that when six samples of vaccine plus preservatives were subjected to HPLC to determine the actual concentrations of the various preservative components, the relative standard deviations of the measured amount of each preservative were found to be no more than 2.0%. This can be seen in the right part of Table 3, under the heading “R.S.D.” This is also stated at page 11, lines 20-21: “For six repeated injections in the same run, the relative standard deviations were better than 2.0% for all compounds.” Thus, one skilled in the art would have interpreted Table 3 and the accompanying description at page 11, lines 20-21 as a teaching that the when [sic] the inventors repeatedly measured the amount of preservative component in a given vaccine preparation, the amount that each component varied was highly reproducible and very small, i.e., the variability was limited to a level of + 2.0%. This would have implied a corresponding ability to make vaccines having this level of variability of the components. Together, this teaching and its implication would lead one skilled in the art to conclude that the amount of variability is vastly different from the 47% to 67% variation from the recited concentrations disclosed in Cleland. Appeal Brief, pages 8-9. The examiner, however, disagrees, asserting that one of ordinary skill in the art would just as likely look to Table 5 to determine the appropriate construction of approximately. Table 5 teaches concentrations of benzyl alcohol as ranging 0.5% to 2%. See Examiner’s Answer, page 6. In addition, the examiner also points to Table 6, which illustrates “stability studies conducted on preparations containing 0.18% methyl paraben sodium and 0.02% propyl paraben sodium . . . [which] would seem to indicate that these are values whichPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007