The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PAUL CHRISTIAN DAVID, MICHAEL IRVIN HYMAN,
EVAN GOMER KICHLINE and PHANI KUMAR VADDADI
__________
Appeal No. 2003-1070
Application 09/021,727
___________
HEARD: December 9, 2003
___________
Before THOMAS, STAAB, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.
FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 30, 34, 38, 41, 43, 44 and 50 through 66. Claims 1
through 29 have been canceled. Claims 31 through 33, 35 through
37, 39, 40, 42 and 45 through 49 have been objected to for being
dependent upon a rejected claim.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007