The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 29 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte GERARD DE HAAN and DANIELE BAGNI ___________ Appeal No. 2003-1085 Application No. 09/190,670 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before OWENS, GROSS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 3, 4 and 6-10, which are all of the claims pending in the application. THE INVENTION The appellants claim methods for motion-compensated predictively encoding and decoding image signals. Claims 1 and 4 are illustrative: 1. A method of motion-compensated predictively encoding image signals, said method comprising the steps of: motion-compensated predictively encoding every third frame by means of motion vectors, and 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007