Ex Parte EISEN et al - Page 4



          Appeal No. 2003-1110                                                        
          Application No. 09/295,439                                                  

          issuer unit (498) with a bit map of the instructions that are               
          suitably unconstrained to be executed (col. 33, lines 20-23                 
          and 28-31).  Instructions that carry dependencies are logically             
          removed from the bitmap (col. 33, lines 31-33).  The instruction            
          issuer unit provides control signals for initiating and                     
          subsequently managing the execution of instructions to the                  
          register rename unit and selectively to parallel functional                 
          units (4780-n) (col. 32, lines 33-34; col. 33, lines 38-42).  A             
          bypass control unit (520) monitors the status of the functional             
          units and, in conjunction with the register references provided             
          from the register rename unit, determines whether data is to be             
          routed from a register file (472) to the functional units, or               
          whether data being produced by the functional units can be                  
          immediately routed via a bypass unit (474) to a functional unit             
          distribution bus (480) for use in executing a newly issued                  
          instruction scheduled by the instruction issuer unit (col. 33,              
          lines 52-61).                                                               
               The examiner’s explanation of the rejection of claims 27               
          and 38 is as follows (answer, pages 4-5):                                   




                                          4                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007