THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MARK A. WEISS
_____________
Appeal No. 2003-1146
Application 09/595,249
______________
HEARD: 20 November 2003
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
rejection of claims 1-44, which constitute all the claims in the application.
The disclosed invention pertains to a method and apparatus for automatically
creating a print job which conforms to the print job specifications of a client.
Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:
1. An automated computer-implemented method of comparing a job quote for a
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007