Appeal No. 2003-1153 Application No. 09/349,214 protection of the vehicle occupants, the improvement wherein said central controller processes the localized crash severity measurements provided by said plurality of remote crash sensors and determines which of said plurality of restraints to deploy by: (a) storing a crash classification mask for each of a plurality of crash classifications, each such mask comprising a set of predetermined remote crash sensor values characteristic of the respective crash classification and a restraint deployment code identifying which of the restraints should be deployed for the respective crash classification; (b) collecting crash severity measurements from the remote crash sensors in the course of a crash event, and storing such measurements in a crash characterization table; (c) consecutively applying said crash classification masks to said crash characterization table, and in the event of a match between the predetermined values of a given crash classification mask and the sensor measurements stored in said crash characterization table, identifying a restraint deployment code from such given crash classification mask; and (d) analyzing the identified restraint deployment code to determine which of said plurality of restraints to deploy. REFERENCES The references relied on by Examiner are as follows: Iyoda 5,899,946 May 4, 1999 (filed Oct. 4, 1996) Kincaid 5,899,949 May 4, 1999 (filed Jan. 26, 1998) Hermann et al. 6,113,138 Sep. 5, 2000 (Hermann) (filed Dec. 9, 1997) REJECTIONS AT ISSUE Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) over Hermann. Claims 3 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007