Ex Parte O'Heeron et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2003-1171                                                        
          Application 09/809,648                                                      

          positions of the appellants and the examiner regarding the merits           
          of these rejections.                                                        
                                    DISCUSSION                                        
          I. The 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of claims 1 and 3 as being              
          anticipated by Danks                                                        
               Danks discloses a trocar (see Figures 6A and 6B) comprising            
          a housing 40, a cannula tube 84 attached to the housing and                 
          defining a bore therewith and an obturator 12 for sliding                   
          engagement in the bore.  The obturator includes a hollow sheath             
          18, a piercing tip 80 on the distal end of the sheath and a                 
          shield 15 slidably disposed within the sheath.  The piercing tip            
          80 consists of a substantially planar pointed blade 81 having a             
          sharp tip 87 and straight sharpened edges 91, and the shield 15             
          consists of a “bottle shaped” distal end 51 having a blunt distal           
          end 92 and opposed slightly concave surfaces 94 which taper                 
          inwardly toward the blunt end.  The shield 15 moves between a               
          fully extended position completely covering the piercing tip                
          (Figures 7A and 7B), a partially retracted position covering part           
          of the piercing tip (Figures 8A and 8B), and a fully retracted              
          position completely exposing the piercing tip (Figures 9A and               
          9B).                                                                        
               Anticipation is established only when a single prior art               
          reference discloses, expressly or under principles of inherency,            
                                          3                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007