Appeal No. 2003-1171 Application 09/809,648 positions of the appellants and the examiner regarding the merits of these rejections. DISCUSSION I. The 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of claims 1 and 3 as being anticipated by Danks Danks discloses a trocar (see Figures 6A and 6B) comprising a housing 40, a cannula tube 84 attached to the housing and defining a bore therewith and an obturator 12 for sliding engagement in the bore. The obturator includes a hollow sheath 18, a piercing tip 80 on the distal end of the sheath and a shield 15 slidably disposed within the sheath. The piercing tip 80 consists of a substantially planar pointed blade 81 having a sharp tip 87 and straight sharpened edges 91, and the shield 15 consists of a “bottle shaped” distal end 51 having a blunt distal end 92 and opposed slightly concave surfaces 94 which taper inwardly toward the blunt end. The shield 15 moves between a fully extended position completely covering the piercing tip (Figures 7A and 7B), a partially retracted position covering part of the piercing tip (Figures 8A and 8B), and a fully retracted position completely exposing the piercing tip (Figures 9A and 9B). Anticipation is established only when a single prior art reference discloses, expressly or under principles of inherency, 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007