The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NAUM V. GITIS and VICTOR DUNN
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1173
Application No. 09/991,855
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.
BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 5-11, 15, 16, 20, 21, 29-40, 48-50, 54-61, 63, 64, and 66-70.
We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007