The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NEELAKANTAN SUNDARESAN
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1177
Application No. 09/510,0541
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, DIXON, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-3. The Examiner has objected to claims 4-7
and 19 and has indicated their allowability if rewritten in
independent form including all of the limitations of the base
claim and any intervening claims while claims 8-18, 20 and 21
have been indicated as allowable.
We reverse.
1 Application for patent filed February 22, 2000.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007