Appeal No. 2003-1204 Application No. 09/592,535 It is clear that Wu never mentions anything about an intersection or a non- intersection of vertical and horizontal axes of rotation and whether or not these axes intersect is not clear from the drawings of Wu. Accordingly, any conclusion that these axes do not, in fact, intersect, may only be based on speculation. Deficiencies in the factual basis needed to support a rejection under 35 U.S.C. §103 cannot be supplied by resorting to speculation or unsupported generalities. In re Freed, 425 F.2d 785, 787, 165 USPQ 570, 571 (CCPA 1970); In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1017, 154 USPQ 173, 177-78 (CCPA 1967). Accordingly, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 1, 2, 13-20 and 30-36 under 35 U.S.C. §103. Moreover, we also will not sustain the rejection of claims 12 and 30 under 35 U.S.C. §103 as obvious over Kawamoto, Wu and Kumar because Kumar does not provide for the deficiencies noted supra with regard to the independent claims. Moreover, even if we agreed with the examiner that Wu disclosed or suggested non-intersecting axes of rotation, the examiner has provided insufficient motivation that would have led the artisan to modify Kawamoto in such a manner as to result in non- intersecting axes of rotation. The examiner’s reasoning that it would have been obvious to modify the hinge assembly of Kawamoto with Wu’s hinge assembly “for the purpose of having the cover being rotating [sic] about two axes perpendicular to each other but 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007