Ex Parte Mickievicz et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2003-1232                                                                              
            Application No. 09/498,268                                                                        

                   Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:                                                
                   An electrical connector comprising:                                                        
                   a common housing having grooves, circuit boards carried by the housing, the circuit        
            boards having edges that are disposed in the grooves, the circuit boards extending parallel to    
            each other in spaced-apart relationship, each of the circuit boards including a substrate and     
            conductive tracks integrally formed on the substrate, the conductive tracks providing electrical  
            paths through the connector, the electrical paths extending from a mating interface at one end of 
            the connector to a mounting interface at another end of the connector.                            
                   The following reference is relied on by the examiner:                                      
            Paagman                         6,083,047                      July  4, 2000                    
                                                                   (filed Jan. 16, 1997)                  

                                                                                                             
                   Claims 1 through 3 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by   
            Paagman.                                                                                          
                   Claims 4 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the      
            examiner relies upon Paagman alone.                                                               
                   Rather than repeat the positions of the appellants and the examiner, reference is made to  
            the Brief (no reply brief has been filed) and to the Answer for the respective positions thereof. 


                                                  OPINION                                                     
                   We sustain both stated rejections of the claims on appeal.  As noted at page 3 of the Brief,
            claims 1 through 6 stand together.  We note also that no arguments are presented in the argument  




                                                      2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007