Appeal No. 2003-1328
Application No. 09/007,493
suggestions in Tyler. We also agree with Appellants (reply
brief, page 2) that the ability of the user to make modifications
to the display position is not sufficient to show a suggestion or
motivation to modify the teachings of Tyler.
In view of our analysis above, we find that the Examiner has
failed to set forth a prima facie case of obviousness with
respect to claim 1 and the other independent claims 23-25 and 35
as the necessary teachings and suggestions related to the claimed
adjusting of the display position based on the determined
positions are not shown. Accordingly, we do not sustain the
35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of independent claims 1, 23-25 and 35,
nor of claims 2-22, 26-34, 36 and 37, dependent thereon.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007