Ex Parte WARD et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2003-1373                                                        
          Application No. 09/430,631                                                  

               decoding a portion of said first transport stream including at         
          least a target out-frame representing a last image frame of said            
          first transport stream to be presented, said decoded portion                
          including non-video data associated with at least one decoded image         
          frame of said first transport stream:                                       
               decoding a portion of said second transport stream including           
          at least a target in-frame representing a first image frame of said         
          second transport stream to be presented, said decoded portion               
          including non-video data associated with at least one decoded image         
          frame of said second transport stream;                                      
               encoding a plurality of said decoded image frames, including           
          said target out-frame and said target in-frame, to produce said             
          transition stream; and                                                      
               inserting, into said transition stream, said extracted3 non-           
          video data.                                                                 
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Perkins et al. (Perkins)      5,859,660           Jan.  12, 1999            
          Chen et al. (Chen)            5,917,830           June  29, 1999            
          Wee et al. (Wee)              6,104,441           Aug.  15, 2000            
                                                  (filed Apr. 29, 1998)               
               Claims 1 through 7, 10, 11, 13, 15, 18 through 22 and 24 stand         
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Wee in         
          view of Perkins.                                                            
               Claims 14, 16 and 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)           
          as being unpatentable over Wee in view of Perkins and Chen.                 




               3 This term lacks antecedent basis.                                    
                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007