Appeal No. 2003-1402
Application No. 09/034,969
CONCLUSION
The examiner’s rejection of claims 1-33 under the judicially created doctrine of
obviousness-type double patenting is reversed. The examiner’s rejections of claims 1-
33 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 or 103 are reversed.
Claims 1-33 are newly rejected by us under the judicially created doctrine of
obviousness-type double patenting. Claims 1-24 and 30-33 are newly rejected by us
under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.
-13-
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007