Ex Parte Whitman et al - Page 8




               Ex parte WHITMAN (2003-1404)                                                                 Paper 23                 
               Application No. 09/532,230                                                                     Page 8                 
                       search queries in a data structure for subsequent look-up, wherein the second                                 
                       component selects a search query from the log based at least in-part on a                                     
                       usefulness of the search query as reflected by the post-search actions performed by                           
                       users who submitted that query,", in the context of the other claim limitations.  In                          
                       this regard, the search terms ultimately selected in Bowman for inclusion in the                              
                       correlation table are not "search queries from the log," but rather are individual                            
                       search terms extracted from multiple-term search queries in the log.                                          
                               Appellants wish to withdraw their remarks made in the paragraph                                       
                       beginning two lines from the bottom of page 7 of the Supplemental Appeal Brief                                
                       [Paper 12], to the extent such remarks may inaccurately characterize Bowman.                                  
                       The remarks on page 7 of Paper 12 are inaccurate, but they do not appear to have affected                     
               the examiner's reasoning and consequently appear to have been harmless.  Withdrawal of the                            
               remarks is acknowledged.                                                                                              
       [34]    The examiner appears to rely on Bowman at 12:60-66 for the disclosure of the second                                   
               component, the data structure based at least in part on the usefulness of the prior query:                            
                       In other embodiments, the selection process 139 combines the related terms lists                              
                       by summing the correlation scores of terms common to other related terms lists,                               
                       without deleting any terms. Another implementation might give weighted scores                                 
                       for intersecting terms such that terms appearing in more than one related terms list                          
                       are weighted heavier than those terms appearing only in a single related terms list.                          
       [35]    By itself, the cited portion only refers to selecting based on correlation scores, but when read                      
               with the disclosure from column 11, which shows the correlation scores can be based on post-                          
               search activities, the examiner appears to be closer to the mark.                                                     
       [36]    As Whitman notes, however, Bowman extracts a term, not a multi-term search query.                                     
       [37]    Nothing in claim 43 requires the initial query to have more than one term.                                            
       [38]    Bowman, however, produces its data structure based on the correlation of terms within a search                        
               query.                                                                                                                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007