Ex Parte UBILLOS - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                                                                 Paper No. 15         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                Ex parte RANDY UBILLOS                                
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2003-1480                                 
                              Application No. 09/226,526                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before JERRY SMITH, BLANKENSHIP, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent          
          Judges.                                                                     
          SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final                 
          rejection of claims 1-20, which are all of the claims pending in            
          this application.                                                           
               We reverse and enter a new ground of rejection under 37 CFR            
          § 41.50(b).                                                                 
                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellant’s invention is directed to a video editing system            
          for controlling velocity of an object movement following a path             
                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007