Ex Parte Stipes - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1485                                                        
          Application No. 09/885,086                                                  


               a jacket surrounding said plurality of individual twisted              
          pairs,                                                                      
               at least two of said twisted pairs each being laterally                
          wrapped with a metal composite shield having a polymer layer and            
          a metal layer, and said metal layer having a thickness of from              
          about 0.0003 inches to 0.001 inches,                                        
               each of said shields has an inner surface and an outer                 
          surface opposite the inner surface and said outer surface facing            
          said jacket,                                                                
               each shield has a first overlapping longitudinal side and a            
          second overlapping longitudinal side, and                                   
               said first and second overlapping sides being bonded                   
          together by a bonding agent.                                                
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Dembiak et al. (Dembiak)      3,703,605           Nov. 21, 1972             
          Krabec et al. (Krabec)        4,477,693           Oct. 16, 1984             
          Gareis                        5,486,649           Jan. 23, 1996             
          Deitz, Sr. et al. (Deitz)     5,956,445           Sep. 21, 1999             
               Claims 1 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being           
          unpatentable over Deitz in view of Dembiak.                                 
               Claims 2 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being           
          unpatentable over Deitz in view of Dembiak and Gareis.                      
               Claims 4 through 6 and 8 through 10 stand rejected under               
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Deitz in view of                 
          Dembiak and Krabec.                                                         



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007