Appeal No. 2003-1505
Application No. 09/218,037
optimization of access performance of a disk by a host processor,
and therefore the deficiencies of Chen as discussed above have
not been overcome. Accordingly, we do not sustain the 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 rejection of claims 1-3, 12-15, 26, 28 and 29-34 over Chen
and Jacobson.
With respect to the rejection of the remaining claims, the
Examiner further relies on Ciotti, Pinheiro, Rowan, Glaser and
Lecourtier. However, none of these references overcomes the
deficiencies of Chen, alone or in combination with Jacobson, as
discussed above with respect to claim 1. Therefore, the 35
U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 4-11, 16-25 and 27 cannot be
sustained.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007