The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. _______________ Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte TING WANG, ALLAN SCHWEITZER, and MAXIMILIAN OTT Appeal No. 2003-1509 Application 09/853,5751 HEARD: December 11, 2003 Before BARRETT, GROSS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the second rejection of claims 1-5, 19, 20, and 43. 1 Application for patent filed May 14, 2001, entitled "Optical Luminescent Display Device," which is a continuation of Application 09/246,145, filed February 8, 1999, now U.S. Patent 6,307,987, issued October 23, 2001, which is based on and claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/098,769, filed September 1, 1998. - 1 -Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007