Ex Parte Maffezzoni - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-1533                                                        
          Application No. 09/566,910                                                  

          computer system may be booted from the copy of the operating                
          system, and if selected data needs to be restored back to the               
          hard drive, the backup location may be accessed.  Claim 7 is                
          illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:             
               7.   A method for protecting data of a computer system                 
          having a hard drive with an operating system stored on a first              
          partition thereof, comprising:                                              
               copying the operating system from the first partition of the           
          hard drive to a second partition of the hard drive and copying              
          selected data from the hard drive to a remote location;                     
               if a crash that prevents the computer system from booting              
          from the operating system stored on the first partition of the              
          hard drive occurs, booting the computer system from the copy of             
          the operating system stored on the second partition of the hard             
          drive; and                                                                  
               if the selected data copied from the hard drive needs to be            
          restored back to the hard drive, accessing the remote location to           
          which the selected data was copied and restoring the selected               
          data back to the hard drive.                                                
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Kikinis                  5,708,776                Jan. 13, 1998             
                                                  (filed May 09, 1996)                
          Perks                    5,924,102                Jul. 13, 1999             
                                                  (filed May 07, 1997)                
               Claims 1 through 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as            
          being unpatentable over Kikinis in view of Perks.                           
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 10,              
          mailed January 27, 2003) for the examiner's complete reasoning in           
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007