Appeal No. 2003-1544
Application No. 09/126,171
Schoner) does not teach or suggest decoding the B-frame twice, as required by some
of the instant claims.
Since the examiner has not convincingly shown that Hoogenboom and/or
Schoner disclose, either separately or in combination, at least the independent memory
and the double decoding features of the instant claims, we will not sustain the rejection
of any of the claims under 35 U.S.C. §103.
The examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-19 under 35 U.S.C. §103 is reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
EAK/vsh
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007