Appeal No. 2003-1583 Application 09/253,235 THE REJECTIONS The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 31-33 and 35-39 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by JP ‘345, and claims 40 and 41 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over JP ‘345. OPINION We affirm the aforementioned rejections. The appellants state that the claims stand or fall separately (brief, page 7). We discuss the claims separately to the extent justified by the appellants’ arguments. See In re Ochiai, 71 F.3d 1565, 1566 n.2, 37 USPQ2d 1127, 1129 n.2 (Fed. Cir. 1995); 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7)(1997). JP ‘345 discloses an apparatus and a method for producing a semisolid metal slurry and using it to make castings (page 3). Molten metal is supplied to the apparatus through a molten metal supply pipe (5) to a vessel (3) having, between its iron skin (1) and fire resistant liner (2), thermal media supply pipes (6) and coolant supply pipes (7) (page 4). Molten metal in the vessel is stirred with stirrer 16 which has a polygonal or cylindrical shape and has embedded therein an iron piece (18) which creates an induction electric current for heating the stirrer (pages 4- 6). “[S}tirrer 16 provides stirring and shearing effects to the molten metal so that growing dendrite structures are crushed and 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007