Ex Parte Acton et al - Page 1






                                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                    
                                today was not written for publication and is not binding                                   
                                precedent of the Board.                                                                    
                                                                                      Paper No. 20                         
                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                   _______________                                                         
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                   _______________                                                         
                                               Ex parte TROY D. ACTON,                                                     
                                   WALTER A. HULLEMEYER, WILLIAM F. NETH                                                   
                                    ROGER L. REUSS and CHARLES F. WINBURN                                                  
                                                     ______________                                                        
                                                  Appeal No. 2003-1592                                                     
                                                  Application 09/492,032                                                   
                                                   _______________                                                         
                                                        ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                   _______________                                                         
              Before WARREN, TIMM and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
              WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         
                                                   Decision on Appeal                                                      
                     This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally                     
              rejecting claims 1 through 15, 17, 19, 26, 28 through 31 and 43 through 47.  Claims 16, 18,                  
              20 through 25, 27 and 32 through 42 are also of record and have been allowed by the examiner.                
              Claims 1, 12, 17, 28, 43 and 46 are illustrative of the claimed invention and the claims on appeal:          
                     1.  A sealable casket having a memorabilia compartment, said casket comprising:                       
                     a shell;                                                                                              
                     at least one cap pivoted to said shell;                                                               
                     said shell and at least one cap having respective confronting flanges;                                
                     a first gasket disposed between said flanges of said shell and at least one cap to seal               
              therebetween;                                                                                                


                                                        - 1 -                                                              



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007