Ex Parte Numrich et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        

                                                            Paper No. 32              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                       Ex parte UWE NUMRICH, MICHAEL WICKER,                          
                                  KLAUS ALBRECHT,                                     
                                   HEINZ VETTER,                                      
                                  HERMANN JAKSCH,                                     
                                  and ERNST MOHR                                      
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2003-1625                                  
                             Application No. 09/341,669                               
                                   ______________                                     
                              HEARD: DECEMBER 9, 2003                                 
                                   _______________                                    

          Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent           
          Judges.                                                                     
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of            
          claims 14-16, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 28, 29 and 32.  The only              
          other claims remaining in the application, which are claims 17,             
          20, 23, 26, 27, 30 and 31, stand withdrawn from further                     
          consideration by the examiner.                                              







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007