The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte LESLIE M. WESTBURY, CARY J. KOOB, ROBERT S. HAMILTON, LARRY R. PROODIAN, LINDA C. STINSON-ALCINI, MICHAEL P. NOON, ROBERT M. ALLISON, DOUGLAS S. KALEMBA, ANNAMALAI KAILAINATHAN and THYAGARAJAN PALANI ____________ Appeal No. 2003-1631 Application No. 09/451,332 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before BARRETT, DIXON and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 8-14, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Claims 1-7 have been canceled. We reverse. BACKGROUND Appellants’ invention is directed to a method for associating carrier information with supplier information forPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007