The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BRUCE G. RICHARDS, JAY PAUL DRUMMOND, DALE BLACKSON,
BOB A. CICHON, JOSEPH C. ESS, MARK A. MOALES,
DAVID W. WEIS, MARK D. SMITH, and JAMES CHURCH
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1659
Application No. 09/193,662
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, SAADAT, and NAPPI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-37, which constitute all the
claims in the application.
The disclosed invention pertains to an Automated Teller
Machine (ATM) adapted to operate in response to communication
with an ATM host via an HTTP server. The ATM host communicates
with the HTTP server through messages having a non-HTTP format,
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007