Ex Parte Kaup - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-1692                                                        
          Application No. 09/835,347                                                  


          providing a digitized picture having pixels, the digitized                  
          picture having at least one picture object with associated object           
          pixels located in the at least one picture object;                          
          dividing the digitized picture at least partly into picture                 
          blocks;                                                                     
          determining the at least one picture object in the digitized                
          picture;                                                                    
          determining at least one object picture block, the at least one             
          object picture block being at least one picture block with at               
          least one object pixel;                                                     
          performing the step of determining the at least one object                  
          picture block such that a relative position of an edge of an                
          object picture block of the digitized picture in relation to the            
          digitized picture corresponds to a relative position of an edge             
          of an object picture block of a chronologically preceding picture           
          in relation to the chronologically preceding picture; and                   
          coding the digitized picture by using the at least one object               
          picture block.                                                              

               The examiner relies on the following reference:                        
          Yamaguchi et al. (Yamaguchi)    5,978,514       Nov. 2, 1999                
                         (filed Oct. 1, 1997)                                         

               Claims 1-19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as                 
          anticipated by Yamaguchi.                                                   
               Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the                     
          respective positions of appellant and the examiner.                         
                                       OPINION                                        
               Anticipation is established only when a single prior art               

                                         -2–                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007