Appeal No. 2003-1704
Application No. 09/604,141
claims 1 through 12, 14, 16, 18 through 21, 23 and 27 through 29 is
reversed.
The obviousness rejection of claims 13, 15, 22, 25 and 26 is
reversed because the teachings of DeHaan do not cure the noted
shortcoming in the teachings of Toma and Shimirak.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 16, 18
through 23 and 25 through 29 is reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOSEPH L. DIXON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
KWH/lp
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007