The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte AFSHIN FALSAFI, MARK S. KONINGS, JOEL D. OXMAN, RICHARD P. RUSIN, and EDWARD J. WINTERS ____________ Appeal No. 2003-1755 Application No. 09/838,950 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before WARREN, TIMM, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Claims 1-24 are pending in the application. Claims 1-6, 9, 11, and 14-21 have been allowed by the Examiner. Claims 22-24 have been withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention. The only claims which remain subject to rejection and thus, subject to appeal, are claims 7, 8, 10, 12, and 13. The sole remaining basis for rejection of thesePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007