Ex Parte Falsafi et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and             
                                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                            
                                                                                             Paper No. 22                            
                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                            ____________                                                             
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                            ____________                                                             
                                        Ex parte AFSHIN FALSAFI, MARK S. KONINGS,                                                    
                                             JOEL D. OXMAN, RICHARD P. RUSIN,                                                        
                                                    and EDWARD J. WINTERS                                                            
                                                            ____________                                                             
                                                        Appeal No. 2003-1755                                                         
                                                     Application No. 09/838,950                                                      
                                                            ____________                                                             
                                                              ON BRIEF                                                               
                                                            ____________                                                             
               Before WARREN, TIMM, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                    



                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                       Claims 1-24 are pending in the application.  Claims 1-6, 9, 11, and 14-21 have been                           
               allowed by the Examiner.  Claims 22-24 have been withdrawn from consideration as being                                
               directed to a non-elected invention.  The only claims which remain subject to rejection and thus,                     
               subject to appeal, are claims 7, 8, 10, 12, and 13.  The sole remaining basis for rejection of these                  











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007