Appeal No. 2003-1765 Page 6 Application No. 09/319,735 16 of the patent. Inasmuch as statutory double patenting cannot be obviated by a terminal disclaimer, it is not clear why claim 15 has not been canceled or subjected to a double patenting rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101. REVERSED ) Toni R. Scheiner ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ) Demetra J. Mills ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) Lora M. Green ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007