The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MARK THOMAS BELLINO, DAVID GLENN BLACK,
GREGORY W. HAGGQUIST, RONALD HAROLD LEVIN,
WEIMEI LUO-GHELETA, SCOTT THOMAS MOSIER,
DAT QUOC NGUYEN, BRADFORD LEE TAYLOR and
FRANKLIN DILWORTH ZARTMAN
_____________
Appeal No. 2003-1774
Application No. 09/797,038
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, OWENS and PAWALIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-9.
Claim 1 is illustrative:
1. A photoconductor comprising
a conductive support layer,
a charge generation layer and
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007