Appeal No. 2003-1775 Application No. 09/845,925 Page 19 CONCLUSION The decision of the examiner to reject claim 39 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kaiser and to reject claims 40 and 41 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kaiser in view of Shideler is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED PETER F. KRATZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JEFFREY T. SMITH ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI ) Administrative Patent Judge ) PFK/sldPage: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007