Ex Parte Donoho et al - Page 16


                 Appeal No. 2003-1794                                                       Page 16                    
                 Application No. 09/804,969                                                                            

                        Appellants also argue that the claimed polynucleotides are useful because                      
                 they can be used for purposes that do not depend on the activity or function of                       
                 the encoded polypeptide.  Appellants argue, for example, that                                         
                        knowledge of the exact function or role of the presently claimed                               
                        sequence is not required to track expression patterns using a DNA                              
                        chip. . . . [T]hose skilled in the art would instantly recognize that the                      
                        present nucleotide sequence would be an ideal, novel candidate for                             
                        assessing gene expression using, for example, DNA chips. . . .                                 
                        Such “DNA chips” clearly have utility, as evidenced by hundreds of                             
                        issued U.S. Patents. . . .  Clearly, compositions that enhance the                             
                        utility of such DNA chips, such as the presently claimed nucleotide                            
                        sequence, must also be useful.                                                                 
                 Appeal Brief, pages 6-7 (emphases in original).                                                       
                        Appellants argue that, in addition to their use in “DNA chips”, the claimed                    
                 sequences are also useful in “localizing the specific region of the human                             
                 chromosome containing the gene encoding the given polynucleotide [sic,                                
                 polypeptide].”  Id., pages 9-10.  More particularly, Appellants argue that                            
                        [t]he presently claimed polynucleotide sequence provides                                       
                        biologically validated empirical data (e.g., showing which                                     
                        sequences are transcribed, spliced, and polyadenylated) that                                   
                        specifically define that portion of the corresponding genomic locus                            
                        that actually encodes exon sequence.                                                           
                 Id., page 10.  Appellants argue that “the described sequences are useful for                          
                 functionally defining exon splice-junctions,” and that “the practical scientific value                
                 of expressed, spliced, and polyadenylated mRNA sequences is readily apparent                          
                 to those skilled in the relevant biological and biochemical arts.”  Id.                               
                        We are not persuaded by Appellants’ argument.  We find that the asserted                       
                 uses of the claimed polynucleotides—as a component of a DNA chip for                                  
                 monitoring gene expression, as a marker for a given chromosomal locus, or for                         





Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007