Appeal No. 2003-1794 Page 16 Application No. 09/804,969 Appellants also argue that the claimed polynucleotides are useful because they can be used for purposes that do not depend on the activity or function of the encoded polypeptide. Appellants argue, for example, that knowledge of the exact function or role of the presently claimed sequence is not required to track expression patterns using a DNA chip. . . . [T]hose skilled in the art would instantly recognize that the present nucleotide sequence would be an ideal, novel candidate for assessing gene expression using, for example, DNA chips. . . . Such “DNA chips” clearly have utility, as evidenced by hundreds of issued U.S. Patents. . . . Clearly, compositions that enhance the utility of such DNA chips, such as the presently claimed nucleotide sequence, must also be useful. Appeal Brief, pages 6-7 (emphases in original). Appellants argue that, in addition to their use in “DNA chips”, the claimed sequences are also useful in “localizing the specific region of the human chromosome containing the gene encoding the given polynucleotide [sic, polypeptide].” Id., pages 9-10. More particularly, Appellants argue that [t]he presently claimed polynucleotide sequence provides biologically validated empirical data (e.g., showing which sequences are transcribed, spliced, and polyadenylated) that specifically define that portion of the corresponding genomic locus that actually encodes exon sequence. Id., page 10. Appellants argue that “the described sequences are useful for functionally defining exon splice-junctions,” and that “the practical scientific value of expressed, spliced, and polyadenylated mRNA sequences is readily apparent to those skilled in the relevant biological and biochemical arts.” Id. We are not persuaded by Appellants’ argument. We find that the asserted uses of the claimed polynucleotides—as a component of a DNA chip for monitoring gene expression, as a marker for a given chromosomal locus, or forPage: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007