Ex Parte St. Clair et al - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2003-1795                                                        
          Application No. 09/821,702                                                  


          We are not persuaded by this argument for the factual findings              
          and conclusions set forth in our previous decisions involving               
          Appeal Nos. 1997-2238 and 1997-4371 and in the examiner’s answer.           
          We set forth those findings of fact and conclusions below for               
          convenience and emphasis (e.g., the decision on Appeal No. 1997-            
          4371, pages 4-7 and the answer page 4):                                     
                    Erickson `464 discloses an epoxy resin composition                
               which includes an epoxidized polydiene polymer which                   
               can be comprised of at least two polymerizable                         
               ethylenically unsaturated hydrocarbon monomers wherein                 
               at least one is a diene monomer (col. 1, line 54 - col.                
               2, line 14; col. 3, lines 11-48).  There is no dispute                 
               as to whether the structural formula of Erickson '464                  
               (col. 1, lines 54-64) encompasses or would have fairly                 
               suggested, to one of ordinary skill in the art, non-                   
               monohydroxylated I-EB-S and I-B-S species.  Erickson                   
               `464 does not disclose that the epoxidized polydiene                   
               polymer can be monohydroxylated.  However, Richards                    
               discloses terminating polymer chains by functional                     
               groups including hydroxyl (col. 3, line 62 - col. 4,                   
               line 14) and, regarding polymers which have a reactive                 
               group on each of its ends, i.e., telechelic polymers                   
               (col. 1, lines 33-35), teaches that terminal                           
               functionalization, i.e., functionalizing the polymer                   
               only at its ends, minimizes the number of free chain                   
               ends in the cured product and is primarily responsible                 
               for a providing a favorable network structure (col. 5,                 
               lines 16-23).  Although Richards specifically addresses                
               difunctional-terminated polymers, the benefits                         
               disclosed by Richards of functionalizing polymers only                 
               at the chain ends, i.e., producing a product which has                 
               fewer free chain ends and a better polymer network                     
               structure, appear to be benefits which one of ordinary                 
               skill in the art also would have considered to be                      
               desirable for polymers which are to be terminated at                   
               only one end by a functional group. Thus, in our view,                 
               the teaching. by Richards would have led one of                        

                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007