The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte OLGA BANDMAN, JENNIFER L. HILLMAN,
PREETI LAL, KARL J. GUEGLER,
GINA GORGONE, NEIL C. CORLEY,
CHANDRA PATTERSON, and
MARIAH R. BAUGHN
__________
Appeal No. 2003-1805
Application No. 09/079,892
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 25
through 28 and 33 through 37. Claims 6 through 12 are pending and have been
allowed. Claims 29 through 32 are also pending but have been withdrawn from
consideration by the examiner. Claims 25 and 33 are representative of the subject
matter on appeal. Since claim 25 refers to allowed claim 7, we reproduce claims 7, 25,
and 33 as follows:
7. An isolated and purified polynucleotide comprising a polynucleotide sequence
as shown in SEQ ID NO:4, wherein said polynucleotide of SEQ ID NO:4 encodes a
polypeptide having glutamine fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase activity.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007