The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KEVIN SCHEHRER, WILLIAM CASSARLY,
DOUGLAS McKNIGHT, RUSSELL M. HUDYMA,
JONATHAN BILES, MILLER SCHUCK and KARL ARMAGOST
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1832
Application No. 09/222,230
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, HAIRSTON, and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-3,
5-12, 14-20, 22-32, 34-36 and 41-44, which are all of the claims pending in this
application.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007