Ex Parte VARONA et al - Page 2




            Appeal No.  2003-1876                                                                             
            Application No. 09/209,044                                                                        
                                             THE INVENTION                                                    
                   Appellants’ claimed invention relates to a three dimensional microfiber web.               
            According to Appellants, the invention is useful for use as a liner for personal care             
            products, such as absorbent underpants and bandages.  (Specification, p. 1).  Claim 1             
            which is representative of the subject matter on appeal is reproduced below:                      
                   1.  A three dimensional material comprising an adhesively creped                           
                   microfiber web having an upper and a lower surface, each having a surface                  
                   energy, wherein said material has a ff(R) of less than 0.87, a SA/VV of less               
                   than 186 cm2/cm3, and a caliper of less than 0.150 inches and wherein an                   
                   average pore size for a first volume encompassing a top surface is not the                 
                   same as an average pore size for a second volume encompassing a lower                      
                   surface.                                                                                   
                   As evidence of unpatentability, the Examiner relies on the following references:           
            Grossman                               4,063,995                 Dec.  20, 1977                   
            Kobayashi et al.  (Kobayashi)          4,810,556                 Mar.  07, 1989                   
            Chen et al.  (Chen)                    5,037,409                 Aug.  06, 1991                   
            Warchol et al.  (Warchol)              5,602,209                 Feb.  11, 1997                   
                                             THE REJECTIONS                                                   
                   The Examiner rejected claims 1-7, 9, 10 and 19-20 under  35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as             
            unpatentable over the combination of Kobayashi and either Grossman or Warchol;                    
            claims 11-18 and 21-32 under  35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combination             
            of Kobayashi, Chen and either Grossman or Warchol. (Answer, pp. 3-6).                             
                                                     -2-                                                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007