Ex Parte ARAKI et al - Page 1




                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and  
                                              is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    
                                                                                                Paper No. 39            
                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                      ____________                                                      
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                      ____________                                                      
                                   Ex parte TAKAYUKI ARAKI, NOBUHIKO TSUDA,                                             
                                                and MASAHIRO KONDO                                                      
                                                      ____________                                                      
                                                  Appeal No. 2003-1926                                                  
                                                Application No. 09/095,842                                              
                                                      ____________                                                      
                                                 HEARD: March 2, 2004                                                   
                                                      ____________                                                      
              Before GARRIS, OWENS, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
              TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        



                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                     This appeal involves claims 6-17, which are all of the claims pending in this application.         
              We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                               















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007