The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIROSHI HONJO, KATSUTO TANAKA, and HIDEKI YAMAMOTO
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1951
Application No. 09/930,258
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, OWENS, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 10. The only other claims pending in the
application, i.e., claims 2, 3, 6, 9, and 11, are not subject to rejection. We have jurisdiction over
the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007