The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES RUSSELL BERGEN, CURT R. CARLSON,
RAKESH KUMAR and SAWHNEY S. HARPREET
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1967
Application No. 08/970,889
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, FLEMING, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-11, 13, 14 and 17-26, all the claims pending in the
instant application. Claims 12, 15 and 16 have been canceled.
Invention
The invention relates to a method and apparatus for
efficiently storing and accessing video information. See page 1
of Appellants' specification. Figure 7 is a graphical
representation of the relative memory requirements of two scene
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007