Ex Parte Todo et al - Page 4


               Appeal No. 3-1969                                                                                                 
               Application 09/690,731                                                                                            

               that we have found is in Miller, wherein a dye which is colorless at a low pH in an undercolor                    
               aqueous coloring composition, changes to the color state upon the addition of a base containing                   
               composition (e.g., col. 3, lines 13-27), and the “dyes in the low pH undercolor coloring                          
               composition are dyes which are in a colorless state in the presence of a pH of about 3.5 or less”                 
               (col. 9, lines 3-5), which include “pthalocyanine [sic, phthalocyanine] dyes” (col. 9, line 7)                    
               identified by the examiner (answer, page 4, fourth full paragraph).  It is apparent from such                     
               teachings that the phthalocyanine dyes change to the color state at a pH above 3.5.  Thus, on this                
               record, we determine that one of ordinary skill in this art would not have reasonably believed that               
               such phthalocyanine dyes falling within the teachings of Miller can provide the discoloring                       
               characteristic during the curing of the dental glass ionomer cements and the aesthetic appearance                 
               in the set cement as required by Kondo, as the examiner contends.                                                 
                      Accordingly, we conclude that the examiner has not pointed to some teaching, suggestion                    
               or motivation in the applied prior art which would have led one or ordinary skill in the art to                   
               combine Kondo with the particular dyes relied on in the secondary references.  Accordingly,                       
               because the examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness, we reverse the                        
               ground of rejection.                                                                                              
                      The examiner’s decision is reversed.                                                                       


















                                                              - 4 -                                                              



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007