Ex Parte Robertson et al - Page 7




          Appeal No. 2003-1983                                                         
          Application No. 09/704,077                                                   


          or references of record convey or suggest that knowledge, is to              
          fall victim to the insidious effect of a hindsight syndrome                  
          wherein that which only the inventor taught is used against its              
          teacher.”)                                                                   
               In sum, the examiner has not shown that Yokoyama, either                
          alone or in combination with any of the secondary references,                
          discloses or suggests the steps of using a laser to create a                 
          fragile marking on a basecoat followed by applying an overcoat of            
          a clear topcoat to protect the fragile marking as required by                
          independent claim 9 and the remaining claims which depend                    
          therefrom.  Accordingly, we find that the examiner has failed to             
          establish a prima facie case of obviousness and the rejections               
          are reversed.                                                                















                                           7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007