Appeal No. 2003-1986 Application 09/315,200 meta-data that would describe something about the true-data contents of each entry" (Br8). In the reply brief, appellant notes the examiner's characterization of specific attributes of Table 4 ("Object Type Name," "Object Type Version," "Last Update Time," etc.) as meta-data that are used to manage a true-data attribute, but argues that "[e]ach of these attributes specify some property of an external object, not properties that are used to manage the true data attribute itself" (footnote omitted) (RBr1). It is argued that the "Object Type Version" in Thomas refers to a version number associated with the external object, not a version number of the "Object Type #1" attribute (RBr2). It is argued that the "Last Update Time" attribute indicates when the external object is updated, not when the information repository is updated (RBr2). In summary, it is argued that "Thomas describes a system in which the attributes contained in an information repository describe external entities, not entities within the data structure itself" (RBr2). We can understand why the examiner made and maintained the rejection. The tables in Thomas show data structures having parameters indented under headings and, as shown in Table 7, the headings and parameters are attributes because they are key/value pairs; thus, the tables closely resemble appellant's Fig. 5A in appearance. The examiner notes that the "Last Update Time" in Table 4 of Thomas is similar to the meta-data attribute - 5 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007