Appeal No. 2003-1993 Application No. 09/470,526 Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellants regarding the noted rejections, we make reference to the examiner’s Answer for the examiner’s reasoning in support of the rejection, and to the appellants' Brief for the appellants' arguments thereagainst. As a consequence of our review, we make the determinations which follow. Background The subject matter of the present application is generally directed to corn plant nucleic acids and their encoded proteins which are involved in cell cycle regulation. Specification, page 4. In particular, the claimed invention is directed to a wee1 homologue from maize, zmwee1, whose activity resembles related protein tyrosine kinases. Specification, page 6. The zmwee1 protein is indicated in the specification to be useful in the genetic engineering of the corn plant to increase maize productivity. Specification, page 3. More specifically, claim 31 is directed to an isolated wee1 nucleic acid comprising a member selected from the group consisting of: a polynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide of SEQ ID NO:2.; a wee1 polynucleotide having at least 80% identity to the entire coding region of SEQ ID NO:1; a polynucleotide comprising the 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007