Ex Parte Sun et al - Page 16




              Appeal No. 2003-1993                                                                                            
              Application No. 09/470,526                                                                                      
              Ex parte Jackson, 217 USPQ 804, 807 (1982).                                                                     
                      In our view, upon reading the disclosure, those of ordinary skill in the art would                      
              have been provided a reasonable amount of guidance to make and use a wee1                                       
              polynucleotide having at least 80% identity to the entire coding region of SEQ ID NO:1.                         
              The specification, pages 27-29 outlines methods for transfection and transformation of                          
              cells and the introduction of DNA into plants.   The examples of the specification                              
              indicate successful expression of zmwee1 in E. coli  as evidenced by the successful                             
              inhibition of cyclin-dependent protein kinase.  Specification, pages 33-34.  In view of the                     
              successful transformation of cells with the disclosed and claimed specific wee1, we find                        
              no evidence or sufficient indicated reason of record why one of ordinary skill in the art                       
              would not have had a reasonable expectation of success in transforming cells and plant                          
              cells with a wee1 polynucleotide having at least 80% identity to the entire coding region                       
              of SEQ ID NO:1 without undue experimentation.                                                                   
                      The rejection of the claims for lack of enablement is reversed.                                         
                                                      CONCLUSION                                                              
                      The rejection of claims 2-11, 31, 33 and 35-36 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                             
              paragraph as containing subject matter that was not described in the specification in                           
              such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the art at the time the application                        
              was filed that the inventor had possession of the claimed invention is reversed.                                





                                                             16                                                               





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007