Ex Parte Kuck - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   

                                                                                    Paper No. 22              

                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                        
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                             Ex parte TED V. KUCK                                             
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                             Appeal No. 2003-2075                                             
                                           Application No. 09/908,073                                         
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
            Before MCQUADE, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
            BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                



                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-28,           
            which are all of the claims pending in this application.                                          


                                               BACKGROUND                                                     
                   The appellant’s invention relates to a method for cutting and boning a fowl to             
            create a meat cut which includes the scapula bone and its associated muscles                      








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007